The CCC+TL cosmological model presents an innovative approach to understanding the universe's expansion by integrating the concepts of tired light theory and covarying coupling constants. This model challenges the conventional reliance on dark matter and dark energy, offering alternative explanations for cosmological phenomena traditionally attributed to these entities.
At its core, the CCC+TL model modifies the standard cosmological frameworks by incorporating covarying coupling constants, which alter the Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric and the Einstein equations. This results in a dynamic universe where fundamental physical constants are not fixed but vary over time, providing a fresh perspective on how the universe evolves. This variation introduces new dynamics that can potentially explain the observed large-scale structure and cosmic background without invoking dark matter and dark energy as separate components (Gupta, 2024).
The tired light theory, a pivotal component of the CCC+TL model, postulates that the redshift observed in distant galaxies is not solely due to the expansion of the universe but also results from light losing energy over time. This loss occurs through interactions with particles or fields as light traverses cosmic distances, leading to a redshift effect. The combination of this tired light effect and the expanding universe offers an explanation for the redshift-distance relationship observed in the cosmos, without necessitating an expanding space paradigm (Gupta, 2024).
The covarying coupling constants in the CCC+TL model provide a theoretical framework wherein the constants of nature, such as the speed of light or gravitational constant, are not absolute but change over time. This variation is crucial as it proposes that the effects typically attributed to dark matter and dark energy could be mimicked by these changing constants. Consequently, this approach seeks to unify the explanation of cosmic phenomena under a single framework, potentially simplifying the complex interplay of forces and energies in the universe (Gupta, 2024).
In summary, the CCC+TL cosmological model offers a novel perspective by combining tired light theory and covarying coupling constants, aiming to explain the universe's behavior without the standard components of dark matter and dark energy. This model sets the stage for re-evaluating cosmological observations and theories, challenging existing paradigms, and potentially reshaping our understanding of the universe's fundamental nature.
(Di Valentino, 2022; inspirehep.net, n.d.; academic.oup.com, 2024; Gupta, 2024)
Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) are periodic fluctuations in the density of visible baryonic matter (normal matter) of the universe. These oscillations are a crucial "standard ruler" for measuring cosmic distances and understanding the expansion history of the universe. The CCC+TL cosmological model, which combines the principles of the tired light theory with covarying coupling constants, offers a novel perspective on interpreting BAO features. This model diverges from the conventional explanation provided by the ΛCDM model by proposing an alternative mechanism for cosmic expansion that does not rely on dark matter or dark energy.
In the context of the CCC+TL model, the explanation of BAO features in galaxy distribution hinges on the interaction between light and matter over vast cosmic scales. The tired light theory suggests that light loses energy as it travels through space, which can account for the observed redshift without invoking an expanding universe. This energy loss mechanism could theoretically create the observed BAO patterns by altering the distribution of galaxies in a way that mimics the effects of spatial expansion. By integrating covarying coupling constants, the model further explains how variations in fundamental physical constants over cosmic time could influence the formation and evolution of these large-scale structures, thereby aligning with observed galaxy distributions.
The sound horizon is the maximum distance that sound waves could travel in the early universe, and it is imprinted in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) as a characteristic scale. In the CCC+TL model, the sound horizon is interpreted through the combined effects of tired light and variable coupling constants. This interpretation suggests that the sound waves experienced different conditions in the early universe than those posited by the ΛCDM model. The CCC+TL model posits that changes in the values of constants like the speed of light or gravitational constant over time could alter the sound horizon's scale, potentially matching the CMB observations without the need for a cosmological constant or dark energy.
BAO observations serve as a critical test for cosmological models. For the CCC+TL model, these observations provide both support and challenges. On one hand, the model's ability to reproduce the observed BAO features in galaxy distribution and the sound horizon in the CMB without relying on dark energy is a significant advantage. It suggests that cosmic expansion might be accounted for by alternative mechanisms. On the other hand, the CCC+TL model faces challenges in explaining the exact quantitative agreement seen in the ΛCDM model, which has been extensively validated through various observational data. The predictive power of the CCC+TL model concerning precise measurements like the angular diameter distance is still an area requiring further exploration and empirical testing.
In conclusion, while the CCC+TL model presents an intriguing approach to understanding BAO features in the universe, its alignment with these observations necessitates further empirical validation. The model's innovative take on the fundamental constants and the tired light theory offers a fresh perspective, but it must be rigorously tested against observational data to ascertain its viability as an alternative to the ΛCDM model.
(Gupta, 2024; Staicova, 2022; journals.aps.org, n.d.; academic.oup.com, 2024; journals.aps.org, n.d.; [Radware Bot Manager Captcha, 2024](https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=3c95fba9-3d77-4655-b7ce-acbb70a863ca&ssb=60030211027&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1475-7516%2F2023%2F07%2F046%2Fmeta&ssi=263f058a-cnvj-4900-8db2-91b40d352c26&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=39294275234407175104484811718018&ssn=c984b42a8d59525f2a52b7407361dc07ad424ae57f96-8b6f-4a6f-a069bc&sso=75ff10b3-39abe00cfe18d78980bafdd3c467e97c46f614e008f5aff3&ssp=35541304661729018140172908836258079&ssq=74427320354290667121503542372286431735814&ssr=MjA4LjgwLjE1NC43NQ==&sst=Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/110.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Citoid/WMF (mailto:noc@wikimedia.org)&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwNjFmNGI3ZWUtZGI5ZC00ZTk2LTk1YWYtYTEzODM0MWY1YzFkMS0xNzI5MDAzNTQyMzY5MC04YmZjOTA3MTAzODJhMTAxMTAiLCJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDAyOTZkZDVhOS03NzViLTQ3MWQtYjdjNy0xM2JhMzI4NmUyNDgxNzI5MDAzNTQyMzY5MC0zZTczMTdjMzNhZTFhZWQ0MTAifQ==); Torres & Agustin, 2024; Lemos et al., 2024; Liu et al., 2024)
The CCC+TL (Covarying Coupling Constants plus Tired Light) cosmological model presents a paradigm shift from the traditional ΛCDM (Lambda Cold Dark Matter) framework by challenging the necessity of dark matter and dark energy. In the ΛCDM model, dark matter and dark energy are pivotal in explaining the universe's accelerated expansion and the formation of cosmic structures. However, the CCC+TL model posits that these phenomena can be attributed to the evolving nature of coupling constants, thereby eliminating the need for hypothetical dark components (Gupta, 2024).
By focusing solely on baryonic matter, the CCC+TL model reinterprets the critical density of the universe. This reinterpretation suggests that the observed cosmological effects traditionally ascribed to dark matter and energy could instead result from the natural evolution of physical constants over time. This approach fundamentally alters the understanding of cosmological dynamics and structure formation by proposing that the observed cosmic acceleration and structure distribution can be explained without invoking invisible matter or mysterious energy sources.
One of the most profound implications of the CCC+TL model is its impact on the estimated age of the universe. This model suggests a significantly older universe than what is posited by the ΛCDM model. The greater age allows for a more extensive timeline for cosmic evolution, providing ample opportunity for the natural formation of large-scale structures without the gravitational influence of dark matter (Gupta, 2024).
In the ΛCDM framework, the universe is approximately 13.8 billion years old, a timeline constrained by the physics of dark matter and dark energy. In contrast, the CCC+TL model proposes an older universe, where the absence of dark matter and the variable nature of constants provide a more flexible cosmological history. This flexibility supports the organic development of galaxies and cosmic structures over a more extended period, potentially aligning with observational data that suggest early galaxy formation.
The divergence between the CCC+TL and ΛCDM models is also evident in their explanations of early galaxy formation. The ΛCDM model relies heavily on dark matter to explain the rapid formation of galaxies and other large-scale structures in the early universe. Dark matter's gravitational pull is considered essential for gathering baryonic matter into dense regions where galaxies can form.
Conversely, the CCC+TL model suggests that early galaxy formation can occur effectively without dark matter. The older universe proposed by this model provides sufficient time for galaxies to form through baryonic processes alone, challenging the ΛCDM model's reliance on dark matter as a catalyst for early structure formation. This perspective offers an alternative understanding of how galaxies could emerge in a universe governed by evolving physical constants rather than static gravitational influences (Gupta, 2024).
In summary, the CCC+TL model presents a radical rethinking of cosmological principles by questioning the existence of dark matter and dark energy, proposing an older universe, and offering a new framework for understanding early galaxy formation. While it presents intriguing possibilities, further empirical validation and comparison with observational data are required to fully assess its viability against the well-established ΛCDM model.
(Da Silva & Silva, 2021; Cline, 2013; journals.aps.org, n.d.; [Radware Bot Manager Captcha, 2024](https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=42b6ffac-f957-4807-9272-e598bbce6f3f&ssb=97063205586&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1475-7516%2F2014%2F02%2F029%2Fmeta&ssi=8b5ba5be-cnvj-46f7-b019-85cfaabb62e3&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=81235326040010049107509564752170&ssn=f01f37ea394a19e513a4c2d1cb6b4efdfeb59caadccc-ea05-4c82-9f3d12&sso=c42380bf-cf71302366ab79e8bf7a04a0e6bf15d6218c4ef0ee35bb4f&ssp=12105185541729060351172900619205722&ssq=69250830354609701859703546978256390276958&ssr=MjA4LjgwLjE1NC43NQ==&sst=Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/110.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Citoid/WMF (mailto:noc@wikimedia.org)&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDAwMTBiMzVkNi1lNDQ1LTQxODgtYWJlNi1iODMyZDNiOGRmNGYxNzI5MDAzNTQ2MDQ3MC0wMjY5OGUyYjIzNDQxZTVhMTAiLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwYmZkMzRjNGUtZTMzNi00YjkyLTkyZGYtYWYzNDAwYWIwYmRhMS0xNzI5MDAzNTQ2MDQ3MC0wZmZmMWVkZmM1MzVkZGY1MTAiLCJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmcifQ==); Antipin et al., 2015; 1994ApJS...95..107W Page 107, 2024; De Andrés, 2024; inspirehep.net, n.d.; 1992AJ....104.1780L Page 1780, 2024; Primack, 2024; Del Popolo & Le Delliou, 2017; academic.oup.com, 2024; [Radware Bot Manager Captcha, 2024](https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=59cf5513-98e7-4f9e-8f47-6ffa6ec9534d&ssb=97063205586&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.3847%2F1538-4357%2Faa63f0%2Fmeta&ssi=b399517c-cnvj-4d9b-be42-e1ff8d85889d&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=81235326040010049107509564752170&ssn=f01f37ea9b6d2d031169a6c4513d4efdfeb56fcb2adb-c70b-4463-9f3d12&sso=c423803b-78115d0a5dd079e8bf7a661ea15f555857df58f3ee35bb4f&ssp=12105185541729060351172900619205722&ssq=69250830354609701859703546978256390276958&ssr=MjA4LjgwLjE1NC43NQ==&sst=Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/110.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Citoid/WMF (mailto:noc@wikimedia.org)&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwNjhmZWUxNzktOGZhMS00MzY2LWI5MmItZTg3ZjRiMjM1YTA4MS0xNzI5MDAzNTQ2ODIwMC1hNzk5NGU3MGZmNDhiOGM3MTAiLCJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDA3NWE2M2NiNi1mZGU4LTQ3MjktOTczNy1kM2UxMjVkZjE3OGMxNzI5MDAzNTQ2ODIwMC1hY2Q1NzNmZjllNDMwYWQ5MTAifQ==); academic.oup.com, 2024)
The CCC+TL cosmological model, which integrates tired light theory with covarying coupling constants, faces several criticisms within the scientific community. One of the primary critiques is its departure from the widely accepted ΛCDM model, particularly in its dismissal of dark matter and dark energy as essential components of the universe's structure. Critics argue that the CCC+TL model lacks the empirical support that underpins the ΛCDM framework, which is extensively corroborated by observations of cosmic phenomena such as galaxy rotation curves and gravitational lensing .
Additionally, the tired light component of the CCC+TL model, which posits that redshift is a result of light losing energy over time rather than the universe's expansion, is criticized for not adequately explaining certain key observations. For example, this theory struggles to account for the uniformity and isotropy of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and the detailed structure of cosmic large-scale networks. Researchers have pointed out that the model's predictions often conflict with precise cosmological measurements, such as the Hubble constant and the age of the universe .
To solidify its claims, the CCC+TL model requires robust empirical validations that can rival those supporting the ΛCDM model. This includes precise measurements of cosmic redshift that could demonstrate an alternative mechanism to the Doppler effect for explaining the observed expansion of the universe. Furthermore, the model would benefit greatly from observational evidence that supports the notion of covarying coupling constants, which could potentially alter our understanding of fundamental forces over cosmic time scales .
Another vital area for empirical validation is the model's explanation of baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) without invoking dark energy. This would require detailed analyses of galaxy distribution patterns and CMB sound horizons that align with the CCC+TL predictions. Such evidence would need to be compelling enough to question the necessity of dark energy in explaining cosmic acceleration .
Future astronomical observations could profoundly impact our understanding of the universe if they provide support for the CCC+TL model. Upcoming missions and next-generation telescopes equipped with more sensitive instruments could offer new data on cosmic redshift and detailed mapping of the universe's large-scale structure. Should these observations align more closely with the predictions of the CCC+TL model, it might prompt a reevaluation of the standard cosmological paradigm .
Furthermore, advancements in particle physics and fundamental constants measurements could shed light on the viability of covarying coupling constants, potentially revolutionizing our understanding of physical laws over cosmic time. Such discoveries could offer a framework for integrating quantum mechanics with cosmology, addressing some of the most profound questions about the universe's origin and fate.
In summary, while the CCC+TL model presents an intriguing alternative to the ΛCDM model, it requires substantial empirical support to overcome current criticisms. Future observations and technological advancements hold the potential to either validate or challenge its foundational principles, ultimately shaping our understanding of the cosmos.
(Garfield, 1979; asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com, n.d.; Shirk et al., 2012; www.tandfonline.com, n.d.; Eyring et al., 2016; Oberkampf et al., 2007; Muhammad et al., 2019; www.taylorfrancis.com, n.d.; De Santis & Chuvieco, 2007; Andreev et al., 2009; inspirehep.net, n.d.; academic.oup.com, n.d.; Chiu, 1967; journals.aps.org, n.d.; academic.oup.com, n.d.)
. (2024). academic.oup.com. Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/509/1/1291/6409149
Di Valentino, E. Challenges of the Standard Cosmological Model. (2022). Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1997/8/8/399
Gupta, R. Testing CCC+TL Cosmology with Observed Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Features. (2024). Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad1bc6
Gupta, R. On Dark Matter and Dark Energy in CCC+TL Cosmology. (2024). Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1997/10/6/266
. (2024). academic.oup.com. Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-abstract/500/1/1201/5936662
Radware Bot Manager Captcha. (2024). Retrieved October 15, 2024, from [https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=3c95fba9-3d77-4655-b7ce-acbb70a863ca&ssb=60030211027&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1475-7516%2F2023%2F07%2F046%2Fmeta&ssi=263f058a-cnvj-4900-8db2-91b40d352c26&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=39294275234407175104484811718018&ssn=c984b42a8d59525f2a52b7407361dc07ad424ae57f96-8b6f-4a6f-a069bc&sso=75ff10b3-39abe00cfe18d78980bafdd3c467e97c46f614e008f5aff3&ssp=35541304661729018140172908836258079&ssq=74427320354290667121503542372286431735814&ssr=MjA4LjgwLjE1NC43NQ==&sst=Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/110.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Citoid/WMF (mailto:noc@wikimedia.org)&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwNjFmNGI3ZWUtZGI5ZC00ZTk2LTk1YWYtYTEzODM0MWY1YzFkMS0xNzI5MDAzNTQyMzY5MC04YmZjOTA3MTAzODJhMTAxMTAiLCJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDAyOTZkZDVhOS03NzViLTQ3MWQtYjdjNy0xM2JhMzI4NmUyNDgxNzI5MDAzNTQyMzY5MC0zZTczMTdjMzNhZTFhZWQ0MTAifQ==](https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=3c95fba9-3d77-4655-b7ce-acbb70a863ca&ssb=60030211027&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1475-7516%2F2023%2F07%2F046%2Fmeta&ssi=263f058a-cnvj-4900-8db2-91b40d352c26&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=39294275234407175104484811718018&ssn=c984b42a8d59525f2a52b7407361dc07ad424ae57f96-8b6f-4a6f-a069bc&sso=75ff10b3-39abe00cfe18d78980bafdd3c467e97c46f614e008f5aff3&ssp=35541304661729018140172908836258079&ssq=74427320354290667121503542372286431735814&ssr=MjA4LjgwLjE1NC43NQ==&sst=Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/110.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Citoid/WMF (mailto:noc@wikimedia.org)&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwNjFmNGI3ZWUtZGI5ZC00ZTk2LTk1YWYtYTEzODM0MWY1YzFkMS0xNzI5MDAzNTQyMzY5MC04YmZjOTA3MTAzODJhMTAxMTAiLCJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDAyOTZkZDVhOS03NzViLTQ3MWQtYjdjNy0xM2JhMzI4NmUyNDgxNzI5MDAzNTQyMzY5MC0zZTczMTdjMzNhZTFhZWQ0MTAifQ==)
Liu, G., Wang, Y., Zhao, W. Testing the consistency of early and late cosmological parameters with BAO and CMB data. (2024). Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269324002752
Staicova, D. DE Models with Combined H0 · rd from BAO and CMB Dataset and Friends. (2022). Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://www.mdpi.com/2218-1997/8/12/631
Torres, L., Agustin, J. Determination of the Hubble Constant and Sound Horizon from Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument Year 1 and Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Baryon Acoustic Oscillation. (2024). Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4434/12/4/48
Lemos, P., Shah, P., Di Valentino, E., Brout, D. The Cosmic Microwave Background and $$H_0$$. (2024). Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0177-7_16
1992AJ....104.1780L Page 1780. (2024). adsabs.harvard.edu. Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1992AJ....104.1780L
Primack, J. Galaxy Formation in ΛCDM Cosmology. (2024). Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102622-023052
1994ApJS...95..107W Page 107. (2024). adsabs.harvard.edu. Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1994ApJS...95..107W
Radware Bot Manager Captcha. (2024). Retrieved October 15, 2024, from [https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=42b6ffac-f957-4807-9272-e598bbce6f3f&ssb=97063205586&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1475-7516%2F2014%2F02%2F029%2Fmeta&ssi=8b5ba5be-cnvj-46f7-b019-85cfaabb62e3&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=81235326040010049107509564752170&ssn=f01f37ea394a19e513a4c2d1cb6b4efdfeb59caadccc-ea05-4c82-9f3d12&sso=c42380bf-cf71302366ab79e8bf7a04a0e6bf15d6218c4ef0ee35bb4f&ssp=12105185541729060351172900619205722&ssq=69250830354609701859703546978256390276958&ssr=MjA4LjgwLjE1NC43NQ==&sst=Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/110.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Citoid/WMF (mailto:noc@wikimedia.org)&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDAwMTBiMzVkNi1lNDQ1LTQxODgtYWJlNi1iODMyZDNiOGRmNGYxNzI5MDAzNTQ2MDQ3MC0wMjY5OGUyYjIzNDQxZTVhMTAiLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwYmZkMzRjNGUtZTMzNi00YjkyLTkyZGYtYWYzNDAwYWIwYmRhMS0xNzI5MDAzNTQ2MDQ3MC0wZmZmMWVkZmM1MzVkZGY1MTAiLCJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmcifQ==](https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=42b6ffac-f957-4807-9272-e598bbce6f3f&ssb=97063205586&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1475-7516%2F2014%2F02%2F029%2Fmeta&ssi=8b5ba5be-cnvj-46f7-b019-85cfaabb62e3&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=81235326040010049107509564752170&ssn=f01f37ea394a19e513a4c2d1cb6b4efdfeb59caadccc-ea05-4c82-9f3d12&sso=c42380bf-cf71302366ab79e8bf7a04a0e6bf15d6218c4ef0ee35bb4f&ssp=12105185541729060351172900619205722&ssq=69250830354609701859703546978256390276958&ssr=MjA4LjgwLjE1NC43NQ==&sst=Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/110.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Citoid/WMF (mailto:noc@wikimedia.org)&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDAwMTBiMzVkNi1lNDQ1LTQxODgtYWJlNi1iODMyZDNiOGRmNGYxNzI5MDAzNTQ2MDQ3MC0wMjY5OGUyYjIzNDQxZTVhMTAiLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwYmZkMzRjNGUtZTMzNi00YjkyLTkyZGYtYWYzNDAwYWIwYmRhMS0xNzI5MDAzNTQ2MDQ3MC0wZmZmMWVkZmM1MzVkZGY1MTAiLCJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmcifQ==)
. (2024). academic.oup.com. Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-abstract/524/3/3385/7221343
. (2024). academic.oup.com. Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-abstract/489/1/1357/5548814
Cline, D. Sources and Detection of Dark Matter and Dark Energy in the Universe: Proceedings of the 10th UCLA Symposium on Sources and Detection of Dark Matter and Dark Energy in the Universe, February 22-24, 2012, Marina del Rey, California. (2013). Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=6YjEBAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=CCC%252BTL+model+challenges+dark+matter+dark+energy&ots=BiVMhXGyLy&sig=4Bfzkam5ku68vE8tHNpVvljotvQ
Radware Bot Manager Captcha. (2024). Retrieved October 15, 2024, from [https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=59cf5513-98e7-4f9e-8f47-6ffa6ec9534d&ssb=97063205586&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.3847%2F1538-4357%2Faa63f0%2Fmeta&ssi=b399517c-cnvj-4d9b-be42-e1ff8d85889d&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=81235326040010049107509564752170&ssn=f01f37ea9b6d2d031169a6c4513d4efdfeb56fcb2adb-c70b-4463-9f3d12&sso=c423803b-78115d0a5dd079e8bf7a661ea15f555857df58f3ee35bb4f&ssp=12105185541729060351172900619205722&ssq=69250830354609701859703546978256390276958&ssr=MjA4LjgwLjE1NC43NQ==&sst=Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/110.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Citoid/WMF (mailto:noc@wikimedia.org)&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwNjhmZWUxNzktOGZhMS00MzY2LWI5MmItZTg3ZjRiMjM1YTA4MS0xNzI5MDAzNTQ2ODIwMC1hNzk5NGU3MGZmNDhiOGM3MTAiLCJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDA3NWE2M2NiNi1mZGU4LTQ3MjktOTczNy1kM2UxMjVkZjE3OGMxNzI5MDAzNTQ2ODIwMC1hY2Q1NzNmZjllNDMwYWQ5MTAifQ==](https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=59cf5513-98e7-4f9e-8f47-6ffa6ec9534d&ssb=97063205586&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.3847%2F1538-4357%2Faa63f0%2Fmeta&ssi=b399517c-cnvj-4d9b-be42-e1ff8d85889d&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=81235326040010049107509564752170&ssn=f01f37ea9b6d2d031169a6c4513d4efdfeb56fcb2adb-c70b-4463-9f3d12&sso=c423803b-78115d0a5dd079e8bf7a661ea15f555857df58f3ee35bb4f&ssp=12105185541729060351172900619205722&ssq=69250830354609701859703546978256390276958&ssr=MjA4LjgwLjE1NC43NQ==&sst=Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/110.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Citoid/WMF (mailto:noc@wikimedia.org)&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwNjhmZWUxNzktOGZhMS00MzY2LWI5MmItZTg3ZjRiMjM1YTA4MS0xNzI5MDAzNTQ2ODIwMC1hNzk5NGU3MGZmNDhiOGM3MTAiLCJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDA3NWE2M2NiNi1mZGU4LTQ3MjktOTczNy1kM2UxMjVkZjE3OGMxNzI5MDAzNTQ2ODIwMC1hY2Q1NzNmZjllNDMwYWQ5MTAifQ==)
Antipin, O., Redi, M., Strumia, A., Vigiani, E. Accidental composite dark matter. (2015). Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2015)039
da Silva, W., Silva, R. Growth of matter perturbations in the extended viscous dark energy models. (2021). Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09177-7
Del Popolo, A., Le Delliou, M. Small Scale Problems of the ΛCDM Model: A Short Review. (2017). Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4434/5/1/17
de Andrés, F. Some Old Globular Clusters (and Stars) Inferring That the Universe Is Older Than Commonly Accepted. (2024). Retrieved October 15, 2024, from http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.11549
Andreev, P., Heart, T., Maoz, H., Pliskin, N. Validating Formative Partial Least Squares (PLS) Models: Methodological Review and Empirical Illustration. (2009). Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2009/193
Oberkampf, W., Trucano, T., Pilch, M. Predictive Capability Maturity Model for computational modeling and simulation.. (2007). Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://www.osti.gov/biblio/976951
Shirk, J., Ballard, H., Wilderman, C., Phillips, T., Wiggins, A., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Minarchek, M., Lewenstein, B., Krasny, M., Bonney, R. Public Participation in Scientific Research: a Framework for Deliberate Design. (2012). Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/26269051
Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G., Senior, C., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R., Taylor, K. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. (2016). Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://gmd.copernicus.org/articles/9/1937/2016/
Muhammad, M., Nashwan, M., Shahid, S., Ismail, T., Song, Y., Chung, E. Evaluation of Empirical Reference Evapotranspiration Models Using Compromise Programming: A Case Study of Peninsular Malaysia. (2019). Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/16/4267
Garfield, E. Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?. (1979). Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019306
De Santis, A., Chuvieco, E. Burn severity estimation from remotely sensed data: Performance of simulation versus empirical models. (2007). Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034425706004974
Chiu, H. A cosmological model for our universe. I. (1967). Retrieved October 15, 2024, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003491667902904